The House of Texas approves new limits on abortion
Federal law already prohibits the sale of fetal tissue.
The proposal has already eliminated the State Senate but will have to return because the Chamber has expanded its scope. However, the state Senate is even more conservative and the passage should be easy.
The amendment on dilation and evacuation prohibits doctors from using clamps or similar instruments on a living fetus to remove it from the uterus in pieces. Anti-abortion advocacy groups claim that the method is the country's safest abortion procedure in the second quarter, and even some anti-abortion groups have opposed it, fearing that This does not compromise the legal challenges. But the conservatives of Texas called Friday practice "barbaric".
"Taken and carved," said Representative Stephanie Klick, Republican of Fort Worth, who joined the amendment to the bill. "This is essentially what we do to these unborn children."
Representative Donna Howard, Austin Democrat, responded that prohibiting the procedure would endanger the lives of pregnant women.
"This is political interference in medicine at worst," said Howard, who beat in tears.
The bill reflects a change in strategy for the Texas Republicans, who in previous years focused on the mother's health in drafting an anti-abortion law , But now focuses on the fetus.
In 2013, Texas approved one of the country's toughest abortion laws, whose supporters said improve women's health. The law imposed costly improvements to the building in abortion clinics while requiring doctors who perform the procedure to have admission privileges.
More than 20 abortion clinics in Texas have been closed after the passage of the law. The Supreme Court overturned much of this legislation, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in the majority opinion that he had not offered enough "medical benefits" to justify the burdens Imposed on women. Three abortion clinics in Texas have since reopened.
Representative Chris Turner of Grand Prairie, head of the House of Texas's Democratic Caucus, predicted future legal challenges to the new law.
"Why do not we stop passing unconstitutional laws for a change?"
Keep reading the main story
HEALTH COACH -
Comments
Post a Comment